#########
Volume 12, Number 44
Monday, November 5, 2012
#########


NOVEMBER IS AMERICAN DIABETES MONTH




In this issue: (click heading to view article)
#########
######### ELM Disruption Caused by DME

#########
######### Rate of RGC Loss in Glaucoma
#########
######### Impact of Systemic Beta-Blocker Use and Need for Repeated Intravitreal Injections in Wet AMD Treated by Bevacizumab
#########
######### Subjective Pain, Visual Recovery and Visual Quality Following LASIK, EpiLASIK and APRK
#########
######### Briefly

 

 

http://www.ecoxoma.com/




ELM Disruption Caused by DME

Disruption of external limiting membrane (ELM) integrity on spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) is associated with lower visual acuity outcomes in patients suffering from diabetic macular edema (DME). However, no automated methods to detect ELM and/or determine its integrity from SD-OCT exist.

Researchers included 16 subjects diagnosed with clinically significant DME (CSME) and these subjects underwent macula-centered SD-OCT (Heidelberg Spectralis, 512 x 19 x 496 voxels). They also scanned 16 subjects without retinal thickening and normal acuity (Carl Zeiss Cirrus, 200 x 200 x 1024 voxels). They achieved automated quantification of ELM disruption as follows. First, 11 surfaces were automatically segmented using their standard 3D graph search approach [18]; the sub-volume between surface six and 11 containing the ELM region was flattened based on the segmented retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) layer; a second, edge-based graph search surface-detection method segmented the ELM region in close proximity "above" the RPE; and each ELM A-scan was classified as disrupted or non-disrupted based on six texture features in the vicinity of the ELM surface. The vessel silhouettes were considered in the disruption classification process to avoid false detections of ELM disruption.

In subjects with CSME, large areas of disrupted ELM are present, the researchers noted. In normal subjects, ELM was largely intact. Additionally, the mean and 95% confidence interval (CI) of the detected disruption area volume for normal and CSME subjects were meannormal=0.00087 mm³ and CInormal=(0.00074, 0.00100), meanCSME=0.00461 mm³ and CICSME=(0.00347, 0.00576) mm³, respectively.

In this preliminary study, the study researchers were able to show that automated quantification of ELM disruption is feasible and can differentiate continuous ELM in normal subjects from disrupted ELM in subjects with CSME. They have started determining the relationships of quantitative ELM disruption markers to visual outcome in patients undergoing treatment for CSME.

SOURCE: Chen X, Zhang L, Sohn EH, et al. Quantification of external limiting membrane disruption caused by diabetic macular edema from SD-OCT. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;Oct 30. [Epub ahead of print].



http://corporate.eyemaginations.com/reviewofopthalmologyemail







Rate of RGC Loss in Glaucoma

The authors of this observational cohort study sought to present and evaluate a new method of estimating rates of retinal ganglion cell (RGC) loss in glaucoma by combining structural functional measurements.

The study included 213 eyes of 213 glaucoma patients followed up for an average of 4.5 ± 0.8 years with standard automated perimetry visual fields and optical coherence tomography (OCT). The authors noted that a control group of 33 eyes of 33 glaucoma patients underwent repeated tests over a short period to test the specificity of the method. They used an additional group of 52 eyes from 52 healthy subjects followed up for an average of 4.0 ± 0.7 years to estimate age-related losses of RGCs. They obtained estimates of RGC counts from standard automated perimetry and OCT, and used a weighted average to obtain a final estimate of the number of RGCs for each eye. The study authors calculated the rate of RGC loss for each eye using linear regression. Progression was defined by a statistically significant slope faster than the age-expected loss of RGCs.

From the 213 eyes, 47 (22.1%) showed rates of RGC loss that were faster than the age-expected decline. The authors of the study also reported that a larger proportion of glaucomatous eyes showed progression based on rates of RGC loss rather than based on isolated parameters from standard automated perimetry (8.5%) or OCT (14.6%; p<.01), while maintaining similar specificities in the stable group.

In conclusion, the rate of RGC loss estimated from combining structure and function performed better than either isolated structural or functional measures for detecting progressive glaucomatous damage.

SOURCE: Medeiros FA, Zangwill LM, Anderson DA, et al. Estimating the rate of retinal ganglion cell loss in glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012;154(5):814–824.


http://event.haag-streit.com/landing.aspx






Impact of Systemic Beta-Blocker Use and Need for Repeated Intravitreal Injections in Wet AMD Treated by Bevacizumab

To evaluate the effect of concomitant systemic therapy in patients with choroidal neovascularization (CNV) secondary to age-related macular degeneration (AMD) treated by intravitreal bevacizumab and to propose a mechanism for different interindividual response, the following retrospective, nonrandomized, single-center, consecutive interventional case series study was performed.

A total of 46 eyes from 46 patients with CNV secondary to AMD were treated by monthly intravitreal 1.25 mg bevacizumab injections on a pro re nata regime. Patients' files were revised and changes in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central foveal thickness as determined by spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), number of injections performed, occurrence of severe adverse effects, and systemic concomitant medication were recorded. The effect of systemic medication on final BCVA, central foveal thickness and number of injections performed was evaluated.

It was reported that the most frequent systemic medications recorded were angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors in 19 patients, beta-adrenergic blocking agents (n=18), nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (n=17), diuretics (n=16), calcium channel blockers (n=14), benzodiazepines (n=11), proton-pump inhibitors (n=9) and statins (n=8). A total of 32 patients had arterial hypertension and average follow-up was 25.1 months (standard deviation [SD]=8.9). Average gain in BCVA was 0.9 (SD=13.6) and –2.1 letters (SD=15.9) at 12 months and 24 months, respectively. It was noted that the average reduction in central foveal thickness was 111 µm (SD=54) and 105 µm (SD=71) at 12 months and 24 months, respectively. The average number of intravitreal injections required was 6.7 (SD=3.2). Furthermore, patients on treatment with systemic beta-adrenergic blocking agents required fewer intravitreal injections (5.2, SD=2.4 vs. 7.9, SD=3.4) and this difference was statistically significant (p=0.0068, multiple linear regression).

It was determined that concomitant systemic beta-adrenergic blocking agents treatment may reduce the need for repeated intravitreal injections of bevacizumab in patients with CNV associated with AMD.

SOURCE: Montero JA, Ruiz-Moreno JM, Sanchis-Merino E, Perez-Martin S. Systemic beta-blockers may reduce the need for repeated intravitreal injections in patients with wet age-related macular degeneration treated by bevacizumab. Retina. 2012;Oct 24 [Epub ahead of print].



http://www.revophth.com/ChicOS2012






Subjective Pain, Visual Recovery and Visual Quality Following LASIK, EpiLASIK and APRK

LASIK is superior to surface ablation techniques (SAT) such as alcohol photorefractive keratectomy (APRK) or Epi-LASIK (EpiK) in terms of visual recovery and postoperative pain. Investigators in Germany compared subjective symptoms and visual recovery of two different SATs with LASIK. Their study does not uniformly support the previously published favorable results of EpiK compared to APRK with regard to subjective recovery of vision and postoperative pain.

The investigators operated on 127 patients using one of the three techniques. Patients filled out a questionnaire describing symptoms assessing subjective visual recovery on a linear scale from "not functioning" to "full visual function" and pain on a linear scale from "no pain" to "severe daily pain". They also evaluated subjective symptoms such as halos, double vision, low night vision, reduced contrast and dry eyes.

They found that visual recovery was faster and discomfort symptoms less pronounced with the LASIK than with the surface ablation procedures. More pain was reported following APRK than after EpiK (flap-off technique) in the early postoperative period, with a maximum of pain on postoperative days 3 and 4. Subjective visual recovery showed no statistically significant difference between the two surface ablation procedures and halos, double vision, low night vision, reduced contrast and dry eyes were more extensively reported by the EpiK than the APRK group and were less pronounced in the LASIK than in the SAT groups.

SOURCE: Skevas C, Katz T, Wagenfeld L, et al. Subjective pain, visual recovery and visual quality after LASIK, EpiLASIK (flap off) and APRK — a consecutive, non-randomized study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2012;Oct 25 [Epub ahead of print].




  • DATA FOR BRACHYTHERAPY DEVICE IN WET AMD PRESENTED. Results from a cohort study evaluating the use of the minimally invasive SalutarisMD retrobulbar episcleral brachytherapy device developed by Salutaris Medical Devices to treat wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD) were presented at the recent American Society of Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) Annual Meeting. The study assessed the feasibility and tolerability of the SalutarisMD investigational treatment for wet AMD using a single dose of episcleral brachytherapy in conjunction with intraocular anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections in a cohort of six subjects. All six subjects showed improvement in vision and three required no additional anti-VEGF injections within the 90-day trail period. Further information about the data from this study can be accessed here.
  • OWL AND WIO TO HOLD JOINT RECEPTION AT AAO MEETING. Ophthalmic Women Leaders (OWL) and Women in Ophthalmology (WIO) will hold a joint reception during the 2012 American Academy of Ophthalmology Meeting on Monday, November 12th from 5:30pm to 7:00pm. The reception will include a WIO presentation of the prestigious Suzanne Veronneau-Troutman Award to Ruth Williams, MD, as well as a charity auction to benefit OWL. Admission is free for OWL and WIO members; non-members pay $25. To register or find out more, visit www.owlsite.org.



Review of Ophthalmology® Online is published by the Professional Publications Division of Jobson Medical Information LLC (JMI), 11 Campus Boulevard, Newtown Square, PA 19073.

To subscribe to other JMI newsletters or to manage your subscription, click here.

To change your email address, reply to this email. Write "change of address" in the subject line. Make sure to provide us with your old and new address.

To ensure delivery, please be sure to add reviewophth@jobsonmail.com to your address book or safe senders list.

Click here if you do not want to receive future emails from Review of Ophthalmology Online.

Advertising: For information on advertising in this e-mail newsletter or other creative advertising opportunities with Review of Ophthalmology, please contact publisher Rick Bay, or sales managers James Henne or Michele Barrett.

News: To submit news or contact the editor, send an e-mail, or FAX your news to 610.492.1049