#########
Volume 12, Number 35
Monday, August 27, 2012
#########


AUGUST IS CATARACT AWARENESS MONTH




In this issue: (click heading to view article)
#########
######### Safety and Efficacy of Immediately Sequential Versus Delayed Sequential Bilateral Cataract Surgery
#########
######### Rate of Retinal Ganglion Cell Loss in Glaucoma
#########
######### Intraocular VEGF Level a Risk Factor for Postop Complications After Vitrectomy for PDR?
#########
######### “Radiation-First” Combination Treatment for Neovascular AMD
#########
######### Briefly

 

 





Safety and Efficacy of Immediately Sequential Versus Delayed Sequential Bilateral Cataract Surgery

At multiple clinics on the Canary Islands in Spain, researchers performed a multi-center, randomized clinical trial to assess the safety and effectiveness of immediately sequential bilateral cataract surgery (ISBCS) versus delayed sequential bilateral cataract surgery (DSBCS).

They randomized patients with cataracts requiring bilateral surgery to ISBCS or DSBCS. Outcome measures were the incidence of intraoperative and postoperative surgical complications, corrected and uncorrected visual acuities and self-perceived visual function (VF-14 questionnaire). The researchers measured all outcomes 30 days postoperatively and assessed self-perceived visual function after one year. They analyzed data with repeated measures to assess temporal effects on surgical complications, visual acuity and function and also estimated effect size for self-perceived visual function.

The researchers found no differences in intraoperative or postoperative surgical complications, visual acuity 30 days postoperatively or self-perceived visual function after one year between the two techniques. They noted that effect size for visual function 30 days postoperatively was moderate in the ISBCS group (n=834) and small in the DSBCS group (n=780). This difference disappeared at one-year follow-up after second-eye surgery in the delayed group.

There were no relevant surgical complications in 1,614 operated eyes and no significant difference in surgical complications, visual acuity or long-term, self-perceived visual function between ISBCS and DSBCS, the researchers reported. They related these safety and effectiveness outcomes to careful patient selection, surgical expertise and the systematic use of standardized surgical guidelines to ensure aseptic and independent surgery in each eye.

SOURCE: Serrano-Aguilar P, Ramallo-Fariña Y, Cabrera-Hernández JM, et al. Immediately sequential versus delayed sequential bilateral cataract surgery: safety and effectiveness. J Cataract Refract Surgy. 2012;Aug 10. [Epub ahead of print].










Rate of Retinal Ganglion Cell Loss in Glaucoma

The following observational cohort study presented and evaluated a new method of estimating rates of retinal ganglion cell (RGC) loss in glaucoma by combining structural and functional measurements.

It included 213 eyes of 213 glaucoma patients followed up for an average of 4.5 ± 0.8 years with standard automated perimetry visual fields and optical coherence tomography (OCT). A control group of 33 eyes of 33 glaucoma patients underwent repeated tests over a short period to test the specificity of the method and an additional group of 52 eyes from 52 healthy subjects followed up for an average of 4.0 ± 0.7 years was used to estimate age-related losses of RGCs. Estimates of RGC counts were obtained from standard automated perimetry and OCT, and a weighted average was used to obtain a final estimate of the number of RGCs for each eye. Additionally, the rate of RGC loss was calculated for each eye using linear regression and progression was defined by a statistically significant slope faster than the age-expected loss of RGCs.

It was reported that from the 213 eyes, 47 (22.1%) showed rates of RGC loss that were faster than the age-expected decline. A larger proportion of glaucomatous eyes showed progression based on rates of RGC loss, rather than based on isolated parameters from standard automated perimetry (8.5%) or OCT (14.6%; p<.01), while maintaining similar specificities in the stable group.

In conclusion, the rate of RGC loss estimated from combining structure and function performed better than either isolated structural or functional measures for detecting progressive glaucomatous damage.

SOURCE: Medeiros FA, Zangwill LM, Anderson DR, et al. Estimating the rate of retinal ganglion cell loss in glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012;Jul 30. [Epub ahead of print].



http://www.revophth.com/ResFellowEdu2012






Intraocular VEGF Level a Risk Factor for Postop Complications After Vitrectomy for PDR?

The authors of this Japanese study enrolled 60 eyes of 52 consecutive patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) who underwent primary vitrectomy to determine whether vitreous and aqueous humor concentrations of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) predict postoperative complications following virectomy for PDR.

They obtained vitreous and aqueous humor from eyes with PDR during primary vitrectomy and measured the levels of VEGF using a FACSCaliber flow cytometer. They also followed patients for more than six months after surgery and recorded demographic data, intraoperative and postoperative findings. The study authors also analyzed the relationship between VEGF levels in ocular fluids and the main postoperative complications of early vitreous hemorrhage (VH) and neovascular glaucoma (NVG) occurring during follow-up. Finally, they performed logistic regression analyses to examine risk factors related to postoperative complications.

According to the authors, early postoperative vitreous hemorrhage occurred in 25%, and postoperative NVG occurred in 8% of 60 eyes. They also noted that the vitreous and aqueous humor levels of VEGF were significantly higher (p=0.002 and 0.006, respectively) in eyes with early vitreous hemorrhage than in those without, and also significantly higher (p=0.023 and 0.001) in eyes with NVG than in those without. Axial length was significantly shorter in eyes with early vitreous hemorrhage than in those without (p=0.028), the authors reported. Furthermore, multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that higher vitreous VEGF level was associated with a risk of early vitreous hemorrhage after vitrectomy for PDR (odds ratio: 12.3, p=0.009).

High intraocular VEGF level at the time of primary vitrectomy in patients with PDR was identified as a significant risk factor for early postoperative vitreous hemorrhage.

SOURCE: Wakabayashi Y, Usui Y, Okunuki Y, et al. Intraocular VEGF level as a risk factor for postoperative complications after vitrectomy for proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;Aug 16. [Epub ahead of print].






“Radiation-First” Combination Treatment for Neovascular AMD

To describe “radiation-first” combination treatment with a non-invasive, low-voltage x-ray irradiation system followed by as needed ranibizuamb for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD), investigators conducted this Phase I study of non-invasive, low-voltage 16 Gy x-ray irradiation delivered in three beams via the inferior pars plana in patients with active neovascular AMD.

They administered ranibizumab as needed per protocol and followed patients monthly for safety and efficacy over 12 months.

The investigators enrolled 13 patients and completed 12 months of follow-up. They found that safety was good with no serious ocular/non-ocular adverse events or radiation-related ocular complications. They also noted that 11 patients lost <15 Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters, seven gained ≥0 ETDRS letters and 0 gained ≥15 ETDRS letters. Patients received a total of 31 subsequent ranibizumab injections (of possible 156) over the 12 months following x-ray irradiation. Mean time to first injection was 3.9 months. The investigators reported that one patient received no ranibizumab injections, three received one injection, four received two injections and five received three or more injections.

To conclude, after 12 months, noninvasive, low-voltage x-ray irradiation with as needed ranibizumab rescue therapy demonstrated good safety with a visual acuity stabilizing effect and reduction in retinal thickness in patients with neovascular AMD.

SOURCE: Moshfeghi AA, Morales-Canton V, Quiroz-Mercado H, et al. 16 Gy low-voltage x-ray irradiation followed by as needed ranibizumab therapy for age-related macular degeneration: 12 month outcomes of a ‘radiation-first’ strategy. Br J Ophthalmol. 2012; Aug 15. [Epub ahead of print].

 







  • ALLERGAN AND MOLECULAR PARTNERS TO DEVELOP NEW PRODUCTS FOR EYE DISEASES. Allergan Inc. and Molecular Partners AG have expanded their existing relationship by entering into two separate agreements to discover, develop and commercialize proprietary therapeutic DARPin products for the treatment of serious ophthalmic diseases. The first agreement is an exclusive license agreement for the design, development and commercialization of a potent dual anti-VEGF-A/PDGF-B DARPin (“MP0260”) and its corresponding backups for the treatment of exudative age-related macular degeneration and related conditions. The second agreement is an exclusive discover alliance agreement under which the parties will collaborate to design and develop DARPins against selected targets that are implicated in causing serious diseases of the eye. For more details on the agreements, click here.
  • FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS ANNOUNCES FUNDING FOR EIGHT NEW SIGHT-SAVING RESEARCH PROJECTS. The Foundation Fighting Blindness has announced an investment of $2.4 million in eight promising research projects aimed at providing treatments and identifying causes of retinal degenerative diseases including age-related macular degeneration, retinitis pigmentosa and Leber congenital amaurosis, among other conditions. Work will involve innovating gene therapies, advancing cell transplantation, understanding AMD risk and developing new therapies for an inherited condition that causes blindness at birth. Each of the eight investigative teams will receive $300,000 for its three-year research efforts. Read more about the new Foundation Fighting Blindness-funded projects here.






Review of Ophthalmology® Online is published by the Professional Publications Division of Jobson Medical Information LLC (JMI), 11 Campus Boulevard, Newtown Square, PA 19073.

To subscribe to other JMI newsletters or to manage your subscription, click here.

To change your email address, reply to this email. Write "change of address" in the subject line. Make sure to provide us with your old and new address.

To ensure delivery, please be sure to add reviewophth@jobsonmail.com to your address book or safe senders list.

Click here if you do not want to receive future emails from Review of Ophthalmology Online.

Advertising: For information on advertising in this e-mail newsletter or other creative advertising opportunities with Review of Ophthalmology, please contact publisher Rick Bay, or sales managers James Henne or Michele Barrett.

News: To submit news or contact the editor, send an e-mail, or FAX your news to 610.492.1049