| |
Volume 3, Number 11
|
Monday, March 17, 2003
|
|
||
|
||
| Glaucomatous
Visual Field Defects in Patients with Migraine This study investigated the visual fields in patients with migraine relative to glaucomatous visual field defects. Patients with headaches diagnosed as migraine were enrolled in the study. Researchers questioned each patient about frequency, side, localization and severity of the pain, as well as onset and duration of symptoms, existence and description (if present) of aura, additional systemic problems and family history of migraine and glaucoma. Clinicians then performed detailed ophthalmological examinations and computerized visual field (VF) analysis on 77 patients (61 female, 16 male), and made statistical comparisons between the group of patients with glaucomatous-like VF defects and the group without significant defects. VF tests revealed glaucomatous-like defects in 48 (62.3 percent) of 77 patients. Intraocular pressure (IOP) levels were within normal limits in all cases. Researchers observed no statistically significant differences between the groups with and without VF defects related to sex, localization and severity of pain, existence and description of aura, or family history of glaucoma; nor did they see differences related to duration of migraine, IOP or cup/disc ratio. The glaucomatous group was significantly older, with a significantly higher age of onset for migraine. Risk of having glaucomatous-like defects was higher in patients who had migraine attacks once a month or less frequently. The study showed a tendency of pain and VF defects to develop ipsilaterally. The authors conclude that a possible relationship exists between the pathophysiology of migraine, visual field defects and glaucomatous optic neuropathy; they recommend VF screening for normal tension glaucoma for patients with migraine. |
|
SOURCES: Comoglu S, Yarangumeli A, Gurbuz Koz O, et. al. Glaucomatous visual field defects in patients with migraine. J Neurol 2003;250(2):201-6. |
|
|
|
||||||
|
||||||
Diclofenac Sodium
0.1% for Vernal Keratoconjunctivitis
The prospective open study was performed in 22 patients with VKC. Subjects used the drops four times daily in both eyes for 120 days. Researchers graded and statistically evaluated signs (papillae, hyperemia and corneal lesions) and symptoms (itching, redness and photophobia) of the ocular surface before and after treatment, using a non-parametric test (Mann-Whitney U-test). At the end of treatment, 40 percent of the patients showed an improvement in their symptoms. Total signs and symptoms scores were significantly decreased at the end of treatment compared with the baseline values (from 6.13 +/- 1.45 to 0.81 +/- 0.90 and from 5.40 +/- 1.18 to 2.63 +/- 0.95, respectively). Researchers saw significant decreases in conjunctival redness, itching, photophobia and conjunctival hyperemia, and they observed no significant differences for corneal lesions and papillary size. No patient showed exacerbation of the disease during treatment. |
|||||||||||||
SOURCE: DAngelo G, Lambiase A, Cortes M, et al. Preservative-free diclofenac sodium 0.1% for vernal keratoconjunctivitis. Graefes Arch Clin Exper Ophthalmol Feb 2003 (online publication date);doi:10.1007/s00417-002-0612-6. |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|||
| Retinal Detachment
Without Macular Hole in Highly Myopic Eyes A study by the Tokyo Medical and Dental University Graduate School, Tokyo, Japan, found a significant prevalence level of foveal retinal detachment without macular hole in patients with highly myopic eyes who had severe myopic degenerative changes and posterior staphyloma. Clinicians performed complete ophthalmic examinations and studied cross-sectional images of the macula with optical coherence tomography (OCT) in 134 eyes of 78 consecutive patients with high myopia (refractive error of -8D or more). The patients were divided into two groups according to the presence (Group One: 78 eyes of 45 patients) or absence (Group Two: 56 eyes of 33 patients) of posterior staphyloma. Slitlamp examination with a Goldmann three-mirror lens indicated that none of the eyes had a macular hole. In seven (9.0 percent) of eyes in Group One, OCT revealed foveal retinal detachment, and 2 of those 7 had foveal retinoschisis. OCT revealed no retinal detachment or retinoschisis in any eye in Group Two. Visual acuity of the seven eyes with foveal retinal detachment in Group One ranged from 20/40 to 20/200. Two of these 7 eyes had visual acuity 20/50 or better. No patients complained of recent, progressive visual impairment. All 7 eyes with foveal retinal detachment had severe myopic fundus changes (focal chorioretinal atrophy or bare sclera). In eyes with this type of retinal detachment, visual acuity varies and foveal retinal detachment tends to be missed on routine examination. Researchers suggest periodic examination by OCT in patients with highly myopic eyes who have severe myopic degenerative changes and posterior staphyloma. |
|
SOURCE: Baba T, Ohno-Matsui K, Futagami S, et al. Prevalence and characteristics of foveal retinal detachment without macular hole in high myopia. Am J Ophthalmol 2003;135(3):338-42. |
|
|
||
| PRK and Use of
Night Vision Goggles A study conducted by the Ophthalmology Service and the Center for Refractive Surgery at Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC, shows that soldiers who have undergone photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) show no significant loss of visual acuity postoperatively and no change in best-corrected visual resolution using night vision goggles (NVGs). Uncorrected visual resolution was significantly enhanced compared with preoperative levels. These findings may translate into better function for soldiers who are unable to or choose not to use optical correction in operational environments. In the nonrandomized, comparative self-controlled trial, researchers measured visual acuity with best optical correction preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively in 19 patients (38 eyes) of active-duty U.S. Army Special Forces soldiers who underwent PRK for myopia and astigmatism. They used acuity charts of various contrast (100, 10, 2.5, 1.25 percent). They assessed preoperative and postoperative (3-month) uncorrected and best-corrected visual resolutions through NVGs using a high-contrast tribar chart presented at four light levels (3.44 x 10-3, 1.08 x 10-3, 1.04 x 10-4, 1.09 x 10-5 foot-Lamberts) simulating a range of night sky conditions. Subjects were trained before testing. Results showed no significant loss of visual acuity across a range of contrast levels 3 months postoperatively: Uncorrected visual acuity at the 3-month assessment was >/= 20/20 in 33 (86.8 percent) of 38 eyes. No eyes lost 2 or more lines of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity. Preoperative and 3-month postoperative best-corrected low-contrast acuity measurements showed no significant differences at all levels of resolution. Researchers also observed no change in best-corrected NVG visual resolution postoperatively. Preoperative visual resolution through NVGs decreased systematically with decreasing night sky conditions, while visual acuities before PRK were reduced without optical correction. Postoperative visual performance with NVGs (without optical correction) equaled or exceeded performance preoperatively with best correction. |
|
SOURCE: Subramanian PS, O'Kane B, Stefanik R, et al. Visual performance with night vision goggles after photorefractive keratectomy for myopia. Ophthalmol 2003;110(3):525-30. |
|
|
|
||||
|
||||
BRIEFLY
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
| Subscriptions: Review of Ophthalmology Online
is provided free of charge as a service of Jobson Publishing, LLC. If
you enjoy reading Review of Ophthalmology Online, please tell a
friend or colleague about it. Forward this newsletter or send this address:
reviewophth@jobson.com.
To change your subscription, reply to this message and give us your old
address and your new address; type "Change of Address" in the
subject line. To unsubscribe, reply to this message and type "Unsubscribe
Me" in the subject line. Advertising: For information on advertising in this e-mail newsletter or other creative advertising opportunities with Review of Ophthalmology, please contact publisher Rick Bay, or sales managers James Henne, Michele Barrett or Lynn Grode. News: To submit news, send an e-mail, or FAX your news to 610.492.1049 |