Home
Features
Departments
News & Trends
|
Pediatrics
Child Abuse
Primer For Ophthalmologists
Ophthalmologists are in a crucial position to detect signs of child
abuse. Some abused children may have no other advocate but you.
Richard J. Olson,
MD Salt Lake City
All physicians are responsible to recognize and report signs
of child abuse, and ophthalmologists have a uniquely important role in
diagnosing Shaken Baby Syndrome. More than 1,000 abused children die yearly in
the United States, and abuse is reported at the astonishing rate of 44 per 1000
children annually.3,11 It is estimated that 4 percent of child abuse
cases present first to an ophthalmologist,2,6 yet many of us are
uncomfortable reporting abuse or unsure of the components of an appropriate
retinal examination for SBS. This review will focus on the forms of physical
abuse ophthalmologists are most likely to see, though all types of abuse should
be reported if suspected.
Child Abuse Overview Though
abuse of children is surely age-old, medical recognition of its extent and
severity is remarkably recent. In 1874, the Society
for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children was formed in New York and modeled
after the Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, which preceded it.
Reports that are highly suggestive of child abuse are scattered in the
literature, but it wasnt until 1962 that the battered child
syndrome was described.3,5 By the late 1960s, all states had
enacted laws to require reporting and to protect children. In 1974, the Child
Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act was passed, mandating reporting of abuse in
every state. Categories of abuse include neglect, physical, emotional and
sexual abuse.3,12
Slap marks and ligature marks are very suggestive of
child abuse.
What You Might See
Ophthalmologists are most likely to see lesions
of the face and limbs initially. Any soft tissue injury in infants is
suspicious, as are multiple soft tissue injuries in toddlers up to age three.
Though bruises are common over bony prominences in mobile children, bruises
elsewhere should be investigated. Patterned bruises (such as slap
marks and ligature marks) are not common but are very suggestive of abuse.
Bruises behind an ear suggest ear pulling.
Human bites tend to be superficial
with bruising, compared to the deep, tearing lesions made by animal bites. A
bite with an intercanine diameter greater than 3 cm is probably made by an
adult.
Oral trauma
includes labial and lingual frenulum tears from forced feeding or sexual
penetration, burns from hot food, and lacerations or bruises at the corners of
the mouth from being gagged.
 Accidental liquid burns in children
usually result from their pulling down hot liquids and are characterized by
splatter marks, usually starting from the chest down. Burns elsewhere or
without splatter marks are suspicious. Well-demarcated stocking/glove or
buttocks burns are almost certainly intentional.
Accidental contact burns are usually
on the palm of the hand, while intentional burns, seen on the dorsum of the
hand or elsewhere, are often clearly demarcated. Cigarette burns are highly
suspicious.3
Retinal hemorrhage due to abusive head
trauma.
Munchausens Syndrome by Proxy is rare, and may occur through
strangulation, poisoning or other bizarre mechanisms. A parent repeatedly
brings the child to medical attention for illness brought on by the parent. The
parent frequently has a medical background, is very friendly with medical staff
and is very involved in the childs treatment.
Periocular, orbital and
sub-conjunctival hemorrhages can be seen, though corneal damage and other signs
of direct eye trauma are less common. Bilateral bruising raises the suspicion
of a basal skull fracture. Retinal hemorrhages suggest so-called Shaken Baby
Syndrome. Remember that other forms of abuse are usually not present in SBS,
and the child may appear physically untouched, though lethargy, irritability
and vomiting are commonly present.3,12
Children at Risk
Though any child may be the victim of abuse,
studies suggest that premature babies, those with chronic medical problems or
developmental delay, and the colicky baby who cries continually are
most at risk. Previous abuse in siblings or the parents increases risk, as does
parental drug and alcohol abuse.
Studies conflict, though most suggest that there is no race
predilection. Low income and low education are cited risk factors, as are
single-parent families, larger families, social isolation and lack of social
support systems. Controversy surrounds most of these risk factors. It cannot be
stressed enough that abuse can happen in any family, at any income level, and
with any racial or cultural background.3,7,12
What to Do
If you suspect abuse, examine the child for additional
injuries. Ask the caregiver how the injuries occurred. You are required to
report your concern either to the police or your states child protection
services. These agencies will keep your report confidential if you wish, but
most who deal frequently with this issue suggest being frank with parents.
You may wish to say
something like: Im concerned about these injuries, and I dont
see how they could have occurred in the way youve described. Together we
need to find out what has happened so we can help your child. I am required by
law to report these injuries. The people who will come to your home will help
us find out what happened.
Your careful history and description of findings are most
important at this point. Retinal hemorrhages should prompt a head CT scan, but
further work-up such as skeletal survey should be done at a center used to
dealing with abuse.3,6
Bruises behind the ear
suggest ear-pulling.
Reluctance to Report Underreporting is rampant. Physicians usually cite fear of
confrontation, fear of losing a patient or the patients family and
friends, destruction of the physician-patient relationship, unwillingness to
believe that abuse could have occurred, and long-term acquaintance with the
family. Reporting may not be easy, but it must be done, and it is the law. The
child may have few, if any, advocates but you.
Potential Mistakes
An accusation of abuse can have far-reaching
consequences, involving every member of the childs family. Cutaneous
findings that may be superficially confused with abuse include infections such
as impetigo, dermatitis, early presentation of leukemia, hemophilia or
idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP), and normal skin markings. Cultural
practices such as folk remedies can be confused with abuse.3 Of
course, we should take care to avoid overreporting, but we must be sure that
our reasons are sound if we think of abuse yet choose not to pursue it.
Shaken Baby
Syndrome
 A complete eye examination has
long been recognized as an essential aspect of the diagnosis of SBS. In fact,
retinal hemorrhages and subdural hematomas are the hallmarks of SBS. Most SBS
victims are under age three, usually much younger. One-third die, and as many
as two-thirds of the survivors have visual deficits, sometimes very severe.
Severe neurological deficits are common.6,7 As ophthalmologists, we
may be asked to perform careful eye examinations on these children, both for
diagnosis and for later legal proceedings.
What might appear to be
only an orbital injury may be Battles sign, indicating a potentially
life-threatening basal scull fracture.
Debate surrounds many aspects of
SBS, simply because the perpetrators rarely report what really happened and the
incidents are usually not witnessed. These controversies are far beyond the
scope of this brief review. They involve such issues as shaking vs. impact, and
the relative significance of the differential diagnosis.
Retinal Findings in SBS
As ophthalmologists, we need to know that
retinal hemorrhages in the setting of subdural hematoma are almost always
caused by abuse.6,7 Consequently, we need to perform a thorough, and
thoroughly documented, eye examination.
Retinal hemorrhages occur in about
80 percent of SBS victims.6,7 Hemorrhages are seen in any layer and
in virtually any configuration. They may be unilateral or asymmetrical. The
finding of retinal hemorrhages requires a head CT, and the finding of subdural
hematoma leads to a retinal examination, though the absence of either finding
does not preclude SBS.
Hemorrhages may be sub-retinal, pre-retinal, vitreal, dome-like
under the internal limiting membrane, white-centered, flame, dot or blot, from
ora to ora or grouped in the posterior pole. Macular folds, circular retinal
folds or traumatic retinoschisis have been well-described. Investigators differ
regarding the most common retinal presentation in SBS.1,6,7,8,10
The Retinal
Examination Before dilation, assess vision,
if possible, check pupil reactivity and test for a relative afferent pupillary
defect. These have been correlated with prognosis for life.6,9 A
complete eye examination should be performed to check for underlying problems
and for other signs of trauma. If at all possible, the retinal examination
should be done with dilated pupils, indirect ophthalmoscopy and indentation.
 Note
and document the retinal findings: Where are the hemorrhages (subretinal,
various retinal layers, sub-ILM, preretinal, vitreous)? In what distribution
(only posterior pole, ora to ora)? In what pattern, if any (peripapillary,
along arcades, mostly posterior pole, and so on)? Approximately how numerous?
Describe the optic disk: Is there edema, disk hemorrhage? Any other retinal
findings such as traumatic retinoschisis or macular folds? Any preexisting
retinal pathology?7
This childs scalp shows signs of hair pulling.
Be detailed; include a thorough
drawing or, better yet, a photograph. Remember that causes of retinal
hemorrhage in a patient with brain injury other than abuse are highly unlikely.
Avoid needless controversy in your assessment. For example, debate continues
regarding the role of impact vs. shaking in these injuries, yet this debate is
not the reason you have been asked to do a retinal examination. You may wish to
write something like this: Findings most consistent with abusive
trauma, rather than using the term shaken baby syndrome. Some
prefer the terms non-accidental trauma or non-accidental
injury.
Differential Diagnosis Retinal hemorrhages are seen in birth trauma, abuse, severe
coagulopathy (hemophilia, von Willebrands disease, vitamin K deficiency),
severe accidental trauma and infection. Other less likely causes include
leukemia, hemorrhagic disease of the newborn, retinopathy of prematurity,
sickle-cell retinopathy and metabolic disease. If the child is more than a few
weeks old, birth trauma is unlikely, and the rest of the possibilities are
generally either self-evident or ruled out in other ways. Medical opinion
overwhelmingly supports non-accidental injury (or SBS) as the most likely cause
of retinal hemorrhage when accompanied by characteristic brain
injuries.4,6,7,12
Prognosis and Aftercare Fifty
to 70 percent of SBS survivors have a good prognosis. Severe vision loss is
most often a result of brain injury (cerebral visual impairment). Optic
atrophy, retinal injury, high myopia, amblyopia and strabismus have also been
reported. These children should be followed for resolution of hemorrhage, and
should be treated or referred as appropriate for amblyopia, high myopia,
strabismus and severe vision loss.6,7,12
Pediatric ophthalmologists often see
SBS, but comprehensive ophthalmologists also are asked to document retinal
findings. We all need to remember our responsibility as physicians to look for
and report suspected abuse in any form. Abuse in childhood has been correlated
with increased substance abuse, psychiatric disorders and criminality in
adulthood.3 Most tragic, perhaps, is that abuse is often passed on
to the next generation.
Your encounter with an abused child may be the only chance that
child has to be protected from further abusea sobering thought
indeed.
Dr. Olson is
an assistant professor of ophthalmology at the University of Utah School of
Medicine.
- Drack AV, Petronio J, Capone
A. Unilateral retinal hemorrhages in documented cases of child abuse. Am J
Ophthalmol 1999;128:340-344.
- Friendly DS. Ocular
manifestations of physical child abuse. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol
1971;75:318-32.
- Jain AM. Emergency
department evaluation of child abuse. Emergency Medicine Clinics of North
America.1999;17(3):575-593.
- Johnson DL, Braun D,
Friendly D. Accidental head trauma and retinal hemorrhage. Neurosurgery
1993;33:231-35.
- Kempe CH, Silverman FN,
Steele BF, Droegenmueller W, Silver HK. The battered child syndrome. JAMA
1962;181:17-24.
- Kivlin JD, Simons KB,
Lazoritz S, Ruttum MS. Shaken baby syndrome. Ophthalmology 2000;107:1246-1254.
- Levin AV. Retinal
haemorrhages and child abuse. In: Recent Advances in Pediatrics, ed. TJ David.
18:151-219.
- Massicotte SJ, Folberg R,
Torczynski E, Gilliland MGF, Luckenbach MW. Vitreoretinal traction and
perimacular retinal folds in the eyes of deliberately traumatized children.
Ophthalmology 1991;98:1124-1127.
- McCabe CF, Donahue SP.
Prognostic indicators for vision and mortality in shaken baby syndrome. Arch
Ophthalmol 2000;118:373-377.
- Mills M. Funduscopic lesions
associated with mortality in shaken baby syndrome. J AAPOS 1998;2:67-71.
- Sedlak A. Study of national
incidence and prevalence of child abuse. Bethesda, MD Westa, 1987.
- Taylor D. Unnatural
injuries. Eye 2000;14:123-150.
Return to
Features page
|