Home
Features
Departments
News &
Trends
|
SHORT
TAKES
Artisan IOL
Offers Safe Alternative
In terms of efficacy, predictability and short-term safety,
the Artisan IOL is a viable alternative to spectacles and contact lenses for
the correction of moderate to severe myopia, according to a prospective
European multicenter study.
The Artisan lens is positioned in
the anterior chamber and is held in place by fixations to the midperipheral
iris stroma, creating a bridge over the optical axis. The lens was implanted in
518 eyes, with powers ranging from -5.0 to -20.0 D. Inclusion criteria were
stable refraction for the previous two years, an anterior chamber depth of 3.0
mm or more and an endothelial cell count of 2,000 cells/mm2 or more. Several
variations of the surgical implant technique were used. Preoperatively,
patients were prepared as for standard cataract surgery, and surgeons used
miotic drops (pilocarpine 1% to 2% or acetylcholine chloride). Ocular
anesthesia was general, retro- or peribulbar.

Follow-up exams were performed at
six months and one, two and three years. Re-searchers observed an uncorrected
visual acuity of 20/40 or better in 76.8 percent of eyes, regardless of the
postoperative goal. A best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 20/40 or
better was noted in 93.9 percent of eyes, and BCVA remained stable throughout
follow-up.
Researchers found the incidence of persistent adverse events at
three years was relatively low1.2 percentand probably involved
naturally occurring macular myopic degeneration. Secondary surgical
interventions (22 eyes) included repositioning of the lens due to poor initial
placement and lens exchange because of preoperative power calculation errors.
Glare and halo effects during night driving were noted and related to large
pupils in young patients. Researchers reported no rotation of the IOL, pupil
ovalization, uveitis or persistent corneal dystrophy. They call for continued
monitoring of patients to establish long-term safety.
(J Cataract Refract Surg
2000;26:8:1163-71) Camille Budo, MD, Jean C. Hessloehl, MD, Milan Izak, MD,
Gregorius P.M. Luyten, MD, Jose L. Menozo, MD, Bozkurt A. Sener, MD, Marie Jose
Tassignon, MD, Herve Termote, MD, Jan G.F. Worst, MD
IOLs Design Gives an Edge The edge design of Phamacia & Upjohns foldable,
silicone, CeeOn Edge model 911 intraocular lens (IOL) prevents the development
of posterior capsule opacification (PCO), according to a 42-eye, 36-patient
German study.
Researchers examined patients 65 years of age or older with good
vision in the fellow eye. The IOLs optic consists of silicone
(polydimethyldiphenyl siloxane copolymer) with a high refractive index of 1.46.
Its optical diameter is 6.0 mm, and overall diameter is 12.0 mm. Patients were
operated on under local anesthesia using phacoemulsification with a 3.5-mm
clear corneal incision. Healon (sodium hyaluronate 1%) was used to ensure
anterior chamber maintenance.
Investigators reported no significant postoperative complications.
Follow-up visits to evaluate best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and the
occurrence of complications were conducted at one day, one week, three and six
months, and one, two and three years. One day after surgery, 66 percent of the
eyes had an uncorrected visual acuity of 0.3 (20/63) or better. At the
three-year visit, 92 percent of eyes achieved a BCVA of 0.5 (20/40) or better,
and 39 percent achieved a BCVA of 1.0 (20/20) or better. In patients with
three-year results, the spherical equivalent was -0.36 D at one week, -0.16 D
after three months, -0.24 D after one year, -0.30 D after two years, and -0.34
D at the three-year mark.
Postoperatively, there were no signs of haze or discoloration of
the IOL, with no inflammatory cell deposits seen on its surface. No Nd:YAG
laser treatments were needed during the three-year follow-up. Citing earlier
studies on lens material and PCO rates and lens design and PCO rates, the
investigators say the absence of complications with the sharp-edged 911 lens
supports the clinical theory that a sharp edge on the IOL prevents the
development of PCO. The authors also suggest that its good long-term
positioning was probably due to the polyvinylidene fluoride (PDFV) haptics and
a continuous curvilinear capsulotomy (CCC) smaller than the lens, providing
circular cover around the optic.
(J Cataract Refract Surg 2000;26:8:1172-75) Werner H.
Schmack, MD, Kristian Gerstmeyer, MD
Study:
Single Agent as Effective, Less Expensive, as Dual Regimen Surgeons may use Acular as a less expensive and safe single-drug
regimen without compromising the effectiveness of a two-drug regimen to prevent
intraoperative miosis and postoperative inflammation in cataract surgery. So
said a study by the Department of Ophthal-mology of the University of Arizona
Health Science Center, sponsored by a grant from Allergan.
Researchers randomized the eyes of
26 patients to receive ketorolac tromethamine 0.5% (Acular) preoperatively and
postoperatively, or flurbiprofen sodium (Ocufen) preoperatively and
prednisolone acetate 1% (Pred Forte) postoperatively. The Pred Forte was
administered q.i.d. for the first week after surgery, t.i.d. for the second
week, b.i.d. for the third week, and then q.d. until one month after surgery.
Two weeks to one month were scheduled between procedures.
Of the 45 eyes enrolled in the study, 23 received the single-drug
regimen and 22 the two-drug regimen. Pupil dilation was measured
preoperatively, intraoperatively and at the end of the surgery. Cell and flare
were graded subjectively at the slit lamp by one of two observers on a scale of
1 to 4+. Assessments were made at one day, one week and one month
postoperatively.
Researchers found no significant difference in pupil dilation pre-
or postoperatively, no significant between-group differences in cell
measurements and no differences between flare measurements at the same
examinations.
Besides cost-effectiveness, the authors emphasize surgeon
convenience with the one-drug regimen. They also state that the single-drug,
steroid-containing regimen may be safer, since steroid use is associated with
adverse effects such as glaucoma and opportunistic infection.
(J Cataract Refract
Surg 2000;26:8:1225-27) Robert W. Snyder, MD, PhD, Rand W. Siekert, OD, Jim
Schwiegerling, PhD, Eric Donnenfeld, MD, Pam Thompson, COA
Deep
Sclerectomy Offers Fewer Complications than Trabeculectomy Non-penetrating deep sclerectomy and trabeculectomy appears to
offer comparable intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction, success rate, visual
outcome and need for postoperative glaucoma medications in the management of
primary open angle glaucoma (POAG). Immediate postoperative complications are
fewer after the sclerectomy, though, according to a bilateral, randomized,
Saudi Arabian clinical trial.
Investigators randomized 39 patients (78 eyes) with bilateral POAG
to receive deep sclerectomy in one eye and trabeculectomy in the other. No more
than three days elapsed between the two procedures. Postoperative management
included the frequent application of topical steroids tapered over several
weeks. Data was collected at one day, through intervals to one year.
Investigators found
a significant IOP reduction after surgery in both groups: 12.3 ± 4.2
mmHg in sclerectomy vs. 14.1 ± 6.4 mmHg in trabeculectomy, and an IOP
21 mmHg was achieved in 36 (92.3 percent) and 37 eyes (94.9 percent),
respectively. There was less hyphema and anterior chamber inflammation in the
deep sclerectomy group. Researchers said complications included three (7.7
percent) flat/shallow anterior chambers and one (2.6 percent) hypotony with
trabeculectomy. Internal iris incarceration was found in two eyes (5.1 percent)
with sclerectomy. Complications by overfiltration were encountered in the
trabeculectomy group only, despite the surgeons technique of tightening
the scleral flap and allowing gradual suture lysis. The authors call for
further study with long-term follow-up to establish the actual effectiveness
and safety of the sclerectomy procedure.
(Ophthalmology
2000;107:9:1671-74) Fathi El Sayyad, FRCS, Magdi Helal, FRCS, Hazem El-Kholify,
FRCS, Mohamed Khalil, MD, MPH, Akef El-Maghraby, FRCS
Return to Features
page
|